This page is the place to discuss the way we structure the information on the site. Information Architecture is primarily about the logical structure of the information rather than the look and feel, although there is inevitably some overlap.
Artefacts
The main artefacts we need to produce are a ?SiteMap (see
http://IAwiki.net/SiteMap) and a series of ?WireFrames (see
http://IAwiki.net/WireFrames). We might also want to produce some ?UserScenarios (see
http://IAwiki.net/ScenarioDevelopment).
The ?SiteMap should be our initial focus because it will have the biggest impact and because we have most flexibility there - I think we should be able to implement much of this using wiki categories, variant ?WireFrames may require deeper wiki hackery.
Areas of concern
The primary areas of concern are: #Organisation, #Labelling, #Navigation, #Search, #Design.
Organisation
Different areas of the site should be organised in different ways appropriate to their content.
- Alphabetical
Usually confined to an index.
- Chronological
Useful for minutes of meetings, events, etc. To ensure correct sort order dates should be in
ISO 8601 format, i.e. YYYY-MM-DD.- Geographical
Useful for information such as locations of nodes, coverage, etc.
- Topic
Useful for a wide range of technical and non-technical information (e.g. hardware recommendations, co-op policies).
- Task
Good for FAQs and HOWTOs (e.g. setting up an access point).
- Audience
Potentially useful for high level entry points to the site (e.g. help for ERN users) or for dividing technical information into (e.g. beginner or expert).
Labelling
Labelling should be as consistent as possible across the site e.g. don't, in general, mix 'topical' and 'task' oriented labels within a single menu. Labels occur in a number of places:
- Contextual links, in the body of a page
- Headings
- Navigation choices
- Index terms
Navigation
The three main types of navigation are:
- Global
- Local
- Contextual
Typically arranged as follows:
+----------------------------------------------------------+ | Global nav - e.g. login, search, etc. + breadcrumb trail | +-----------+----------------------------------------------+ | | | | Local nav | | | | | | often | Contextual nav | | heir- | | | archical | links embedded in page content | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----------+----------------------------------------------+
These can be augmented with 'social navigation' e.g. top 5 or bottom 5 most popular pages, people came to this page from..., trackback links, etc.
Other constructs to consider are 'site map', 'page index' and 'guides', i.e. structured walkthroughs of a particular task (wizard style).
Search
Search issues include:
- ?SearchZones, i.e. which areas of the site are indexed and searchable independently
- ?ContentComponents, i.e. which parts of the page are indexed
- Result listings, how should they be ordered?
- by relevance
- by popularity
- by date
- alphabetically
Design
Design Spec for BW
What is it going to be used for? Most importantly:
- Poster
- Website
- Letterheads
- Business Cards
- Login screen and desktop background
Less importantly:
Compliment slips, invoices, icons (computer desktop icons), leaflets, T-shirts, pens, antennas, giveaway computers, stickers and mugs
Who is the design aimed towards
We identified the following groups: funders, potential network members, current network users, telephone support users, partner organisations, NGO's, Regional Development Agencies, policy makers and the general public.
How do we want to be perceived
This question caused the most consternation as there where two main groups of ways we would like to be perceived based on two seperate markets we are involved in. Firstly we would like to seen as:
- Competent
- Reliable
- Confident
for our professional relationships and
- Inclusive
- Fluffy
- Approachable
These are not necessarily mutually exclusive in terms of our designs we hope. Other general perceptions are:
- Innovative
- Communication based (our raison d'etre)
- Multi-cultural
- Open source advocates and users
What we don't want
Antennas, aggressive looking, themes suggesting radiation, phallic looking, owls (owls?!)
Must urgent things to produce
- Logo (colour)
- Colour set
- Business cards
- Open source fonts
We would like to use open source fonts, here is a list:
http://linuxlibertine.sourceforge.net/
http://copacetix.com/fonts.php
http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ (Bitstream Vera)
You could drop this requirement as the amount of fonts is too limited and use freely available fonts (we must be able to use them in our work free of charge). (
http://www.goodfonts.org/)
Bristol Wireless Community Co-operative Ltd. Registered under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act and with the FSA. Registration Number 29638R
Donate via Paypal
Donations allow us to connect those within our communities who find themselves excluded from the communications revolution










