Show Sidebar Log in

Open Source and the Cloud coming to Hove

Our friends at Omnis Systems in Brighton are organising an event – Open Source, the Cloud and your Business – at Sussex County Cricket Club, Hove, BN3 3AN (map) on Tuesday 18th November.

Banner for event

Many organisations in the private, public, voluntary and community sectors are now starting to look seriously or are in part using “the Cloud” and Open Source technology. However, there is still some as to the business benefits that can be realised by using these tools.

Those who worry are not alone. Very often even IT resellers and consultants find it difficult to understand if they are offering the best solutions to their customers as they have limited visibility on what is available apart from the offerings from their standard vendors.

This seminar will be examining what Cloud and Open source technology actually are, how public and private sector organisations are using them and what business opportunities they offer. The seminar will also explore a few of the common myths that surround those technologies and get into some real life case studies on how organisations can benefit.

Time Description Speakers
09:00 / 09:30 Registration & event presentation  
09:30 / 10:00 Cloud, Open Source or both? Understanding what “Cloud” really is. The definition, the services, the good, the bad and the ugly. There are very useful aspects of the Cloud to consider but there are also some issues that have security, economical and ethical impacts you may have not considered. Paolo Vecchi
Omnis Systems
10:00 / 10:30 How you could help the Public Sector in being more efficient by offering your services through G-Cloud and how we can help you getting there faster. Chris Farthing
Advice Cloud
10:30 / 11:00

Providing “Cloud” services since before it was cool. Moving bits for UK businesses.

Joe Kerr
11:00 / 11:30 Coffee break & time for networking/questions  
11:30 / 12:00 Securing your Cloud identity with Single Sign-On and strong authentication Giuseppe Paternò
12:00 / 12:30 Local Government representative from London talking about their experience with Open Source and Open Alliances that could be formed between organisations to share code and experiences (Awaiting confirmation and full speech description)  TBA
12:30 / 13:30 Lunch break and networking  
13:30 / 14:00 Technology Choices for Business Strategy

Businesses compete fiercely in a market changing ever faster. Public bodies too must deliver better for less. Their strategic response is to focus on users, iterate products, drive down costs, design for easy change, share knowledge and experience, and widen access to more kinds of suppliers and innovation. Find out how your technology choices can support business aims.

Tariq Rashid, speaking in a personal capacity, previously leading on open source for the Cabinet Office.

Tariq Rashid
14:00 / 14:30

Open what? Does Open Source matter to my business? It may matter as, like it or not, you are using a lot of it but your suppliers don’t want to tell you.

We will also look at examples of how IT resellers let down their customers by selling them the wrong solutions for the job and how Councils spend (badly?) our money…

… and at a few tools, including Collax V-Cube & Business Server, that businesses can adopt to consolidate their IT infrastructure, simplify its management and reduce costs.

Paolo Vecchi
Omnis Systems
14:30 / 15:00

Zarafa Communication Platform a safer & cost-effective way to communicate

Zarafa has always been the best drop-in replacement for Microsoft Exchange but now is taking its ambitions further. With the inclusion of telephony, video conferencing, file & document sharing and many other features Zarafa is now ready to take on Office365 and GoogleApps. What’s the point? You can control your data & your privacy, integrate your applications and at the same time spend even less than by using general purpose Cloud applications.

Zarafa Communication Platform can be installed on Linux distributions like RedHat, Ubuntu and Debian. In this presentation it will be shown running on Univention Corporate Server which allows you to manage your Linux based infrastructure using a professionally designed web interface.

Marco Welter
15:00 / 15:30 LibreOffice-from-Collabora provides an enterprise hardened and supported build of the world’s most popular Open Source ‘Office’ software LibreOffice. Large Corporate and Public Sector organisations now have a secure and long term supported alternative to proprietary Office software. Tim Eyles
15:30 / 16:00 Coffee break, networking, QA  
16:00 / 16:30 Reducing costs and complexity. Open Source based solutions for Windows and Linux desktop virtualisation Mike Trevor
Cutter Project
16:30 / 17:00

Entando, the most agile way to share informations and connect to the “Internet of Things”

Rinaldo Bonazzo
17:00 / 17:30 How Linux and Open Source platforms allow us manage millions of emails and contacts on our mailing and CRM solutions Andrew Mann
17:30 / 18:30 QA, networking, beers, wine.  

Full details are available on the Omnis Systems website.

Register for the event via Eventbrite.

Your correspondent will be attending and will report back after the event.

Poor take-up prompts revamp of broadband voucher scheme

image of fibre-optic cableThe current hard copy of Networking magazine (to which Bristol Wireless subscribes. Ed.) reports on its front page that on account of poor take-up of the broadband connection voucher scheme (of which we’re part. Ed.), the government is revamping its offer of £3,000 to get businesses on high-speed broadband connections in 22 cities. Apparently fewer than 3,000 companies have claimed a mere £7.5 mn. of the £150 mn. pot.

According to the Networking report, the voucher no longer covers just the direct capital cost of providing the connection, but also the running costs and the Department of Culture, Media and Sport has said that suppliers are now free to use the cash to create a free or discounted product.

In addition, a £2 mn. advertising campaign has been implemented to give the scheme a boost, whilst the DCMS attempted to put more impetus into the scheme in a press release dated 22nd September.

One wonders whether the Department’s revamping of the scheme (not its first, either. Ed.) is prompted by an urge to spend as much of the total £150 mn. before the scheme ends in March 2015.

According to the scheme’s administrators the take-up of vouchers by city as at 17th September 2014 was as follows:

  • Aberdeen: 10
  • Belfast: 297
  • Birmingham: 120
  • Brighton: 28
  • Bristol: 20
  • Cambridge: 38
  • Cardiff: 156
  • Coventry: 90
  • Derby: 23
  • Derry/Londonderry: 25
  • Edinburgh: 86
  • Leeds & Bradford: 464
  • London: 981
  • Manchester & Salford: 468
  • Newcastle on Tyne: 48
  • Newport (South Wales): 17
  • Oxford: 18
  • Perth: 1
  • Portsmouth: 9
  • York: 38

That’s a grand total of 2,937 businesses.

To find out if you’re a business* eligible for a connection voucher, visit the Connection Vouchers website.

* = This includes sole traders, social enterprises and small businesses.

Hamburg’s Greens want city to get rid of Microsoft

Tux holding Hamburg coat of armsHamburg’s Green want to wean the city off its Microsoft dependency and are pointing to Munich’s use of Linux, German IT news website heise reports.

On the occasion of the impending 2014 Open IT Summit Hamburg’s Greens demanded the liberation of the city council from dependency on Microsoft. For Green Party Hamburg Parliament member Farid Müller it’s a matter of examining “if and how Hamburg can disengage itself from the US giant Microsoft”. The city must become independent of Microsoft the monopolist. By doing so it could also save millions in licensing costs. In this context Müller refers to the LiMux project in Munich, where the city council’s use of Linux and free and open source software is currently under discussion.

The 2014 Open IT Summit, whose emphasis is on open source and data security, is taking place today (Tuesday) as an alternative event to the IT summit with German Chancellor Angela Merkel taking place in Hamburg. The range of topics extends from the Heartbleed bug via cloud computing up to a Microsoft exit strategy for Hamburg. a podium discussion will sound out whether a migration to free software is realistic for Hamburg.

Reposted from the author’s blog.

“Women deserve to be part of the IT crowd,” comments Bristol 24/7

Women Who Code logoAda Lovelace Day, that annual celebration of women in science, technology, engineering and medicine, may be gone for another year (news passim), but that doesn’t mean it’s forgotten.

Earlier today local news site Bristol 24/7 carried a comment piece by Ujima Radio presenter Cheryl Morgan entitled “Women deserve to be part of the IT crowd.

Starting with Ada’s work with Babbage, the piece moves forward through the significant and changing role of women in IT:

Grace Hopper, an admiral in the US Navy, first taught computers to understand human-like language. She invented the compiler, a tool that can convert the programming languages we are familiar with today into instructions more easily understood by machines. She also invented the Cobol programming language.

It also highlights the problems that women can face in what are seen as “male” professions:

However, when an industry becomes male-dominated, it is hard for women to survive in it. I’m reminded of a cartoon in which a group of businessmen tell their sole woman colleague: “You are the only person who thinks this organization is sexist.”

Cheryl’s piece leaves its best piece till last: a branch of Women Who Code has now been established in Bristol. This is the organisation’s third city group after Belfast and London.

The Bristol Women Who Code group will be holding its inaugural meeting on Thursday 23rd October at the Engine Shed at Temple Meads (map). This will be a hack event entitled Coding in the Cloud. At the time of writing, only 4 places were left, so if you want to attend, hurry up!

Munich sticks with LiMux and free software

Limux iconOn Tuesday, Munich’s first mayor finally responded to an inquiry by the Green Party (PDF, German) about rumours regarding a possible reversion to a Windows-based desktop environment from its current Linux-based LiMux system (news passim). The response shows that there is no factual basis for the claims made by first mayor and second mayor. An evaluation of the IT infrastructure and processes is in progress.

In recent months, statements by the newly appointed mayors Reiter and Schmid (Munich has 3 mayors. Ed.) have stirred up confusion about the future IT strategy of Munich. Contrary to third mayor Christine Strobl, the first and second mayors have hinted in recent months a possible end to the use of free software within the city. However, facts were hard to obtain. The answer to the inquiry has now shed some light on the matter.

No factual basis for criticism

The mayor now admits that the often-cited waiting time needed to obtain official work mobile phone is unrelated to the LiMux operating system, but was instead caused by the fact that he was the first to demand the implementation of Apple’s iOS in the city’s IT infrastructure.

As regards the missing unified mail and calendar application criticised by Schmid, it became clear that the relevant Kolab free software solution is currently being implemented. This only started in early 2014 and is expected to be in use early in 2015.

Broad support for free software in Munich

The city’s IT department, the city council and third mayor Christine Strobl all support the current IT strategy and thus distance themselves from the criticisms of the first and second mayors. Ms Strobl emphasises that “upon careful checking” she still considers the move to free software was the right thing to do.

There’s a sound economic basis for this view: the city was able to save €11 mn. just in reduced licensing costs. The hardware costs alone of switching to Windows 7 would have amounted to €3.15 mn., with a move to Windows 8 being even more expensive, according to the city’s IT department. Furthermore, a switch would incur additional costs and mean the loss of achievements in supporting open standards.

FSFE makes vendor independence and interoperability plea

The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) is calling on Munich’s city council to include both vendor independence and interoperability as factors in the investigation, since they were major reasons for Munich switching to free software in the first place.

“Other European Countries such as Great Britain, France, Italy, and Sweden have made free software and Open Standards a central part of their IT strategies for the public sector in the past years. In Germany, the public sector is lagging behind. Germany’s federal and state governments finally need to take coherent action so that public institutions here, too, can enjoy the benefits of Free Software,” says FSFE President Karsten Gerloff.

Nominations open for Women in Open Source award

RedHat reports that Linux purveyor Red Hat is now accepting nominations for the Women in Open Source Award. Created to highlight the achievements women making major contributions to an open source project, to the open source community or through the use of open source methodology, this award is the first of its kind.

The award celebrates all different kinds of contributions to open source, including:

  • Code and programming;
  • Quality assurance, bug triage and other quality-related contributions;
  • Involvement in open hardware;
  • System administration and infrastructure contributions;
  • Design, artwork, user experience (UX) and marketing;
  • Documentation, tutorials and other forms of communication;
  • Translation and other internationalisation contributions;
  • Open content;
  • Community advocacy and management;
  • Intellectual property advocacy and legal reform;
  • Open source methodology.

Nominees can qualify for one of two tracks:

  • Academic award: open to women enrolled in college or university; and
  • Community award: open to all other women.

    The Women in Open Source Academic Award winner will receive:

  • $2,500 stipend, with a suggested use of supporting an open source project or efforts; and
  • A feature article on

The Women in Open Source Community Award winner will receive:

  • Ticket, flight and hotel accommodation for the Red Hat Summit to be held in Boston, Massachusetts on 23rd-26th June 2015;
  • $2,500 stipend, with a suggested use of supporting an open source project or efforts;
  • A feature article on; and
  • Speaking opportunity at a future Red Hat Women’s Leadership Community event.

Nominations are open until 21st November. Judges from Red Hat will whittle down the nominees to a subset of finalists for both the Academic and Community awards, from whom the public will decide the winners. The winners will be announced in June during an awards ceremony at the 2015 Red Hat Summit in Boston, Massachusetts.

Introducing the anonabox

Crowdfunding site Kickstarter has announced that August Germar is currently raising funds for anonabox, a Tor hardware router that will re-route data through the Tor network for security and anonymity.

The anonabox is an open source internet networking device designed to run alongside a current home router or modem. Small enough to fit in a jacket or trouser pocket, the device directs all of a user’s internet traffic via wifi or an Ethernet cable to Tor, where his or her original IP address is hidden from prying eyes, an important privacy consideration since Edward Snowden revealed the scope of surveillance routinely carried out by the NSA in the USA and GCHQ in the UK.

August was originally seeking a total of $7,000 to take the project further, but has already raised 10 times that amount, according to Computerworld. At the time of writing the total had risen to $501,872 and the appeal for funds still had 27 days to run.

August has produced a small video to introduce the anonabox and how it works.

Kickstarter backers can reportedly secure an Anonabox for $45, a few dollars cheaper than what it will allegedly be sold for.

Free public lecture at Bristol Uni for Ada Lovelace Day

Ada LovelaceTomorrow, 14th October, is Ada Lovelace Day, an annual an international celebration of the achievements of women in science, technology, engineering and maths.

As part of the celebrations, Bristol University is organising a free public lecture focussing on Ada Lovelace’s life and pioneering work.

Ada Lovelace – the first programmer’ by Professor Philipp Welch from the School of Mathematics, starts at 1.00 pm on Tuesday 14th October in the Merchant Venturers Building.

In addition, Bristol University’s Computer Sciences Society is holding a special event on Wednesday 15th October with talks from seven speakers to showcase the careers of women in computing and engineering and discuss the challenges women have to overcome. The Computer Sciences Society’s showcase begins at 1.00 pm on Wednesday 15th October in the Merchant Venturers Building.

Both events are free to attend and no booking is required. For more information visit the University’s Ada Lovelace events page.

Ada Lovelace was the daughter of the ‘mad, bad and dangerous to knowLord Byron and died in 1852. Her work with Charles Babbage on the ‘Analytical Engine‘ makes her an important figure in the early development of computer technology.

Ada’s mathematical notes include what is widely accepted as the first algorithm intended to be executed by a machine. Babbage was so impressed with her talents that he called her the ‘Enchantress of Numbers’.

Open Knowledge Foundation defines open

Open Knowledge Foundation logoThe Open Knowledge Foundation is doing marvellous work in the fields of open data and open content.

The Foundation has just published version 2 of its Open Definition. This definition is released under a Creative Commons Attribution licence and is reproduced verbatim below (complete with US spellings and punctuation throughout. Ed.).

Open Definition

Version 2.0

The Open Definition makes precise the meaning of “open” with respect to knowledge, promoting a robust commons in which anyone may participate, and interoperability is maximized.

Summary: Knowledge is open if anyone is free to access, use, modify, and share it — subject, at most, to measures that preserve provenance and openness.

This essential meaning matches that of “open” with respect to software as in the Open Source Definition and is synonymous with “free” or “libre” as in the Definition of Free Cultural Works. The Open Definition was initially derived from the Open Source Definition, which in turn was derived from the Debian Free Software Guidelines.

The term work will be used to denote the item or piece of knowledge being transferred.

The term license refers to the legal conditions under which the work is made available. Where no license has been offered this should be interpreted as referring to default legal conditions governing use of the work (for example, copyright or public domain).

1. Open Works

An open work must satisfy the following requirements in its distribution:

1.1 Open License

The work must be available under an open license (as defined in Section 2). Any additional terms accompanying the work (such as a terms of use, or patents held by the licensor) must not contradict the terms of the license.

1.2 Access

The work shall be available as a whole and at no more than a reasonable one-time reproduction cost, preferably downloadable via the Internet without charge. Any additional information necessary for license compliance (such as names of contributors required for compliance with attribution requirements) must also accompany the work.

1.3 Open Format

The work must be provided in a convenient and modifiable form such that there are no unnecessary technological obstacles to the performance of the licensed rights. Specifically, data should be machine-readable, available in bulk, and provided in an open format (i.e., a format with a freely available published specification which places no restrictions, monetary or otherwise, upon its use) or, at the very least, can be processed with at least one free/libre/open-source software tool.

2. Open Licenses

A license is open if its terms satisfy the following conditions:

2.1 Required Permissions

The license must irrevocably permit (or allow) the following:

2.1.1 Use

The license must allow free use of the licensed work.

2.1.2 Redistribution

The license must allow redistribution of the licensed work, including sale, whether on its own or as part of a collection made from works from different sources.

2.1.3 Modification

The license must allow the creation of derivatives of the licensed work and allow the distribution of such derivatives under the same terms of the original licensed work.

2.1.4 Separation

The license must allow any part of the work to be freely used, distributed, or modified separately from any other part of the work or from any collection of works in which it was originally distributed. All parties who receive any distribution of any part of a work within the terms of the original license should have the same rights as those that are granted in conjunction with the original work.

2.1.5 Compilation

The license must allow the licensed work to be distributed along
with other distinct works without placing restrictions on these other works.

2.1.6 Non-discrimination

The license must not discriminate against any person or group.

2.1.7 Propagation

The rights attached to the work must apply to all to whom it is redistributed without the need to agree to any additional legal terms.

2.1.8 Application to Any Purpose

The license must allow use, redistribution, modification, and compilation for any purpose. The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the work in a specific field of endeavor.

2.1.9 No Charge

The license must not impose any fee arrangement, royalty, or other compensation or monetary remuneration as part of its conditions.

2.2 Acceptable Conditions

The license shall not limit, make uncertain, or otherwise diminish the permissions
required in Section 2.1 except by the following allowable conditions:

2.2.1 Attribution

The license may require distributions of the work to include attribution of contributors, rights holders, sponsors and creators as long as any such prescriptions are not onerous.

2.2.2 Integrity

The license may require that modified versions of a licensed work carry a different name or version number from the original work or otherwise indicate what changes have been made.

2.2.3 Share-alike

The license may require copies or derivatives of a licensed work to remain under a license the same as or similar to the original.

2.2.4 Notice

The license may require retention of copyright notices and identification of the license.

2.2.5 Source

The license may require modified works to be made available in a form preferred for further modification.

2.2.6 Technical Restriction Prohibition

The license may prohibit distribution of the work in a manner where technical measures impose restrictions on the exercise of otherwise allowed rights.


The license may require modifiers to grant the public additional permissions (for example, patent licenses) as required for exercise of the rights allowed by the license. The license may also condition permissions on not aggressing against licensees with respect to exercising any allowed right (again, for example, patent litigation).

Reposted from the author’s blog.

Campaigners cut ties with Connecting Shropshire

switchThe taxpayer-subsidised scheme to provide better broadband in the United Kingdom has run into some difficulty in Shropshire.

The Shropshire and Marches Campaign for Better Rural Broadband has severed its ties with the Connecting Shropshire scheme led by Shropshire Council, according to yesterday’s Shropshire Star.

The campaign had been working with the council and BT to try and bring high-speed broadband to the county’s more isolated rural parts and attempt to secure a government grant of £11.38 mn. with matched funding from the council.

Campaigners had hoped initially that areas with poor coverage would be prioritised and there would be a universal commitment to more than the minimum 2Mb/s guarantee. It now appears this is not the case.

Campaign spokesman Patrick Cosgrove is quoted by the Star as saying:

After much thought, the Shropshire and Marches Campaign for Better Rural Broadband has concluded that there is little useful purpose in continuing with its membership of Connecting Shropshire’s rural broadband group.

To begin with there were high hopes that the thoughts of the members might help devise ways of identifying the matched funding for the £11.38m BDUK grant, and engage communities and other interest groups in imaginative ways of bringing faster broadband to rural communities.

We have been disappointed. Attendance at the group has been patchy, agendas pre-set, and conditions of confidentiality too inhibiting for our campaign to express its views freely.

We fear that publicity from the present broadband project will increasingly be used for political purposes.